Every institute owner knows which teacher is carrying the place and which one is coasting. Almost none can prove it, so the appraisal conversation becomes an argument about opinions. Drishtaa turns work that is already being recorded into a score both of you can look at.
Nobody fills in a self-assessment. The number comes from things that happen anyway, so it cannot be gamed by writing a better paragraph about yourself.
Attendance marked on time or three days late. Marks entered or still pending a week after the test. Homework set. Remarks written. Every one of these is a record with a timestamp already sitting in the system.
How the batch actually performed, how it moved between tests, and how many students in it slipped without anyone noticing. A teacher whose weak students improve scores higher than one whose strong students stayed strong.
The teacher sees the same score you do, updated as they work - not sprung on them in March. That is the point: a score nobody can see changes nothing.
This is the part most institute software does not do at all. It stores your data. It does not tell you anything about the people running your institute.
They accept it far better than a subjective appraisal, because they can see the score, see what moves it, and see that it is the same for everyone. The ones who object are usually objecting to being visible.
Yes. The weights are yours - if entering marks on time matters more in your institute than remarks, set it that way.
No. That is the whole design. If the teacher is already marking attendance and entering marks, the score builds itself.
Yes, in full. Move the sliders on the how it works page and watch a score change on your own numbers.
More on: · · · Classplus alternative
Bring one teacher's last term - attendance, marks, results. We will build their scorecard in front of you and you can decide if it matches what you already believe.
Book a free demo